The Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in Selected ASEAN and East Asian Countries: Evidence from Panel Data Analysis, 2010–2024

Authors

  • Yan Ari Nugroho Universitas Borobudur, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Halilintar Universitas Borobudur, Indonesia
  • Puji Astuti Universitas Borobudur, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59261/jedvb.v4i2.94

Keywords:

FDI, ASEAN, east Asia, panel Data, regulatory Quality, government Expenditure

Abstract

Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) has become an important driver of economic development, technology transfer, and regional competitiveness in ASEAN and East Asian countries. Nevertheless, previous empirical studies have produced inconsistent findings regarding the relative importance of macroeconomic variables and institutional factors in attracting foreign investment. This study aims to examine the effects of government expenditure, interest rates, exchange rates, net exports, and regulatory quality on FDI inflows across ten ASEAN and East Asian economies during the 2010–2024 period. The study employs balanced panel data consisting of 150 country-year observations obtained from international secondary databases. Panel data estimation is conducted using Common Effects, Random Effects, and Fixed Effects models, with Chow and Hausman tests indicating that the Fixed Effects Model is the most appropriate specification. The empirical results demonstrate that regulatory quality and government expenditure have positive effects on FDI inflows, whereas interest rates negatively affect foreign investment. Exchange rates and net exports exhibit relatively weak explanatory power, indicating that short-term macroeconomic variables are less influential once institutional factors are considered. These findings suggest that institutional quality, regulatory predictability, and efficient public expenditure play a more decisive role than conventional fiscal incentives in attracting sustainable foreign investment. The study contributes to the international investment literature by providing comparative evidence from ASEAN and East Asia and reinforcing the importance of an institutional political economy perspective in explaining FDI location decisions while offering practical guidance for policymakers seeking to improve long-term investment competitiveness.

References

Unctad, U. T. and D. (2024). World Investment Report 2024: Investment facilitation and digital government. https://unctad.org/publication/world-investment-report-2024

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2013). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty.

Bhujabal, P., Sethi, N., & Padhan, P. C. (2024). Effect of institutional quality on FDI inflows in South Asian and Southeast Asian countries. Heliyon, 10(5), e27060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27060

Buchanan, J. (1999). The collected works of James M. Buchanan. Cir.Nii.Ac.Jp. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1971712334772795568

Chen, F., & Jiang, G. (2023). The impact of institutional quality on foreign direct investment: empirical analysis based on mediating and moderating effects. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2134903

Chizema, D. (2025). The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Economic Development in South Asia and Southeastern Asia. Economies, 13(6), 157. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies13060157

Dao, T. B. T. (2025). How government spending matters to FDI inflows in developing countries? European Journal of Government and Economics, 14(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.17979/ejge.2025.14.2.11723

Dunning, J. (2008). Institutions and the OLI paradigm of the multinational enterprise. SpringerJH Dunning, SM LundanAsia Pacific Journal of Management, 2008•Springer, 25(4), 573–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10490-007-9074-Z

Fauzel, S., Matadeen, J., Tandrayen Ragoobur, V., & Gunnoo, L. (2025). The Impact of RCEP on Trade and FDI for East and Southeast Asian Economies. Transnational Corporations Review, 17(4), 200141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tncr.2025.200141

Hausman, J. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. JSTOR. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1913827

Islam, M. S., & Beloucif, A. (2024). Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: A Systematic Review of the Empirical Studies. Foreign Trade Review, 59(2), 309–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/00157325231158846

Jin, K. (2023). The new China playbook: Beyond socialism and capitalism.

Khan, M. A., Ibrahim, Y., Othman, N. S., & Saleem, S. F. (2025). Attracting Foreign Direct Investment in ASEAN : The Impact of Institutional Quality and Macroeconomic Drivers. Journal of Public Affairs, 25(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.70071

Krugman, P. R., Obstfelt, M., & Melitz, M. J. (2012). International economics: theory and policy ninth edition.

Lucas. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. ElsevierRE Lucas JrJournal of Monetary Economics, 1988•Elsevier. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304393288901687

Nguyen, V. C. (2023). Monetary Policy and Foreign Direct Investment—Empirical Evidence. Economies, 11(9), 234. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11090234

North, D. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance.

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action.

Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Information and the Change in the Paradigm in Economics. American Economic Review, 92(3), 460–501. https://doi.org/10.1257/00028280260136363

Syarifuddin, F. (2022). The dynamics of foreign direct investment and exchange rates: An interconnection approach in ASEAN. Cogent Economics & Finance, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2058156

Tag, M. N., & Degirmen, S. (2022). Economic freedom and foreign direct investment: Are they related? Economic Analysis and Policy, 73, 737–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2021.12.020

Downloads

Published

2026-07-25